CA Law review; PC 400s and H&SC 11300s, anon. case study…

Investigation log ID 2014pvtcx44k

what follows is anon cx booking data by APD and OCSD. These are not real charges because in THIS COUNTRY, we are INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY.  (per due process reqmts provided by US Constitution) The green team must justify rank, file, racism, human rights violations, constant Bill of Rights violations, gambling losses and shard abuse via bogus charges that not even the depraved OCDA would submit to the judiciary; this equally corrupt group is also on notice from law rvws, the ca bar, etc for ethics violations.  Only a reason to book and set bail. In bold, the code prose and [my] initial rxn, probable OCDA rvw process a priori to arrgnmt @CJX.

Please note that there are members of the Orange County Judiciary (Superior Court Judges) who DO IN FACT respect our Constitution and Human Rights – granted both by God and Amendments 1-10

plz also note that the last time this writer visited CJX, due to being 1 week late on a $60 payment; was taken out of his sick bed, forced to dress and shot thru the loop (IRC) where the OCSD forced him to hop on one foot (right leg was still in early healing stages post-experimental trauma ops to rebuild all bones and joints, walker was not allowed in “disabled” holding cell…wtf? sound cruel and unusual much?) placed in medical for 1 night and then solitary confinement with no medicine save sarax and tylenol, called a “n—–r c-nt” by a CO after an Episcopal service by a CO (niceway to end church, red. ad absurdum). OCDA received formal reprimand from the judiciary for “wasting the state’s dwindling CDC budget on a nonviolent disabled man” who shows “longterm good behavior”

10 day flash found to be cruel and unusual;

judge ordered imm. SE,

discharged probation, rest., 140 days of CalTrans and all fines.

OCSD and OCDA also advised to “stop harassing Mr. [tapper7], allow him to recover, respect his newly restored rights and to stop wasting the court’s docket time” Epic legal win.

Compiled by Tapper7, sr. researcher and due process auditor for case #************* Formal rpt and axn item rqst fwd due- OCPD, a priori, voir dire etc.

legal research avail: http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes.xhtml

****Editor’s note. spc thx to Mariano, Alladin Bail Bonds

plz visit  http://www.aladdinbailbonds.com/ for all things AB-related.

Notable CA laws for a hypothetical anonymous and bogus court case. A valuable case study…if law enforcemt booked YOU on the following felonies. …how much time are you realistically looking at?

… Opinions based on exp, research and CA Penal Code and CA Health & Safety Code.

Tapper7 is NOT an attorney. Op-ed not to taken seriously. This writer IS a private investigator and is available to wade through bullshit and locate truth for my readers. Comment or visit Tapper7 on g+ for 24/7 research and consulting for business, finance, legal affairs, IT, tutoring, training, music/design/comm/…and special topics.

****pc 459 –   difficult to prove – this charge will get tossed by OCDA. Innocence probability ~= 75 percent. OCDA likely to toss, too expensive for state to prosecute.

Every person who enters any house, room, apartment, tenement, shop, warehouse, store, mill, barn, stable, outhouse or other building, tent, vessel, as defined in Section 21 of the Harbors and Navigation Code, floating home, as defined in subdivision (d) of Section 18075.55 of the Health and Safety Code, railroad car, locked or sealed cargo container, whether or not mounted on a vehicle, trailer coach, as defined in Section 635 of the Vehicle Code, any house car, as defined in Section 362 of the Vehicle Code, inhabited camper, as defined in Section 243 of the Vehicle Code, vehicle as defined by the Vehicle Code, when the doors are locked, aircraft as defined by Section 21012 of the Public Utilities Code, or mine or any underground portion thereof, with intent to commit grand or petty larceny or any felony is guilty of burglary. As used in this chapter, “inhabited” means currently being used for dwelling purposes, whether occupied or not. A house, trailer, vessel designed for habitation, or portion of a building is currently being used for dwelling purposes if, at the time of the burglary, it was not occupied solely because a natural or other disaster caused the occupants to leave the premises.

****pc 460 subsxn b follows:

(a) Every burglary of an inhabited dwelling house, vessel, as defined in the Harbors and Navigation Code, which is inhabited and designed for habitation, floating home, as defined in subdivision (d) of Section 18075.55 of the Health and Safety Code, or trailer coach, as defined by the Vehicle Code, or the inhabited portion of any other building, is burglary of the first degree.

****(b) All other kinds of burglary are of the second degree. wrong place wrong time. a bogus charge I dont see the DA following up on.

(c) This section shall not be construed to supersede or affect Section 464 of the Penal Code.

(Amended by Stats. 1991, Ch. 942, Sec. 15.)

****pc 476-likely a bad note. also diff to prove even if Cx was in poss. InnProb. ~=70 percent. Not cost effective to submit to state. Toss.

Every person who makes, passes, utters, or publishes, with intent to defraud any other person, or who, with the like intent, attempts to pass, utter, or publish, or who has in his or her possession, with like intent to utter, pass, or publish, any fictitious or altered bill, note, or check, purporting to be the bill, note, or check, or other instrument in writing for the payment of money or property of any real or fictitious financial institution as defined in Section 186.9 is guilty of forgery.

h&s 11350to review and follow from OCPD; best option to reduce or prop out. InnocenceProb almost nil. recommend plead out and apply for all avail programs ie hope house. hard to fight, ez to prove. Misd. hs para poss charge not noted -11350/77 supercedes and overides 11364a. Anon could recv county lid per subsxn B (cost effective, avoid commserv. sucks but not end of world)

(a)  Except as otherwise provided in this division, every person who possesses (1) any controlled substance specified in subdivision (b) or (c), or paragraph (1) of subdivision (f) of Section 11054, specified in paragraph (14), (15), or (20) of subdivision (d) of Section 11054, or specified in subdivision (b) or (c) of Section 11055, or specified in subdivision (h) of Section 11056, or (2) any controlled substance classified in Schedule III, IV, or V which is a narcotic drug, unless upon the written prescription of a physician, dentist, podiatrist, or veterinarian licensed to practice in this state, shall be punished by imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170 of the Penal Code.

(b)  Except as otherwise provided in this division, every person who possesses any controlled substance specified in subdivision (e) of Section 11054 shall be punished by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one year or pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170 of the Penal Code.

(c)  Except as otherwise provided in this division, whenever a person who possesses any of the controlled substances specified in subdivision (a) or (b), the judge may, in addition to any punishment provided for pursuant to subdivision (a) or (b), assess against that person a fine not to exceed seventy dollars ($70) with proceeds of this fine to be used in accordance with Section 1463.23 of the Penal Code. The court shall, however, take into consideration the defendant’s ability to pay, and no defendant shall be denied probation because of his or her inability to pay the fine permitted under this subdivision.

(d)  Except in unusual cases in which it would not serve the interest of justice to do so, whenever a court grants probation pursuant to a felony conviction under this section, in addition to any other conditions of probation which may be imposed, the following conditions of probation shall be ordered:

(1)  For a first offense under this section, a fine of at least one thousand dollars ($1,000) or community service.

(2)  For a second or subsequent offense under this section, a fine of at least two thousand dollars ($2,000) or community service.

(3)  If a defendant does not have the ability to pay the minimum fines specified in paragraphs (1) and (2), community service shall be ordered in lieu of the fine.

(Amended by Stats. 2011, Ch. 15, Sec. 151. Effective April 4, 2011. Operative October 1, 2011, by Sec. 636 of Ch. 15, as amended by Stats. 2011, Ch. 39, Sec. 68.)

****h&s 11377.  olc likely to get tossed in toto or run concurrent to h&s11350 per Bill of Rights as verbage nearly identical to 11350. Double jeopardy. More green team rights stomping, salary justification, clog judiciary. Obvious bullshit. CDC/OCSD corruption. YOUR taxes fund this clogged, wasteful system that does little to address crime and MUCH to “take a confused kid and turn him into a for-real-no-shit-felon” -Jim Hogsdale

(a) Except as authorized by law and as otherwise provided in subdivision (b) or Section 11375, or in Article 7 (commencing with Section 4211) of Chapter 9 of Division 2 of the Business and Professions Code, every person who possesses any controlled substance which is (1) classified in Schedule III, IV, or V, and which is not a narcotic drug, (2) specified in subdivision (d) of Section 11054, except paragraphs (13), (14), (15), and (20) of subdivision (d), (3) specified in paragraph (11) of subdivision (c) of Section 11056, (4) specified in paragraph (2) or (3) of subdivision (f) of Section 11054, or (5) specified in subdivision (d), (e), or (f) of Section 11055, unless upon the prescription of a physician, dentist, podiatrist, or veterinarian, licensed to practice in this state, shall be punished by imprisonment in a county jail for a period of not more than one year or pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170 of the Penal Code.

(b) (1)  Any person who violates subdivision (a) by unlawfully possessing a controlled substance specified in subdivision (f) of Section 11056, and who has not previously been convicted of a violation involving a controlled substance specified in subdivision (f) of Section 11056, is guilty of a misdemeanor.

(2) Any person who violates subdivision (a) by unlawfully possessing a controlled substance specified in subdivision (g) of Section 11056 is guilty of a misdemeanor.

(3) Any person who violates subdivision (a) by unlawfully possessing a controlled substance specified in paragraph (7) or (8) of subdivision (d) of Section 11055 is guilty of a misdemeanor.

(4) Any person who violates subdivision (a) by unlawfully possessing a controlled substance specified in paragraph (8) of subdivision (f) of Section 11057 is guilty of a misdemeanor.

(c) In addition to any fine assessed under subdivision (b), the judge may assess a fine not to exceed seventy dollars ($70) against any person who violates subdivision (a), with the proceeds of this fine to be used in accordance with Section 1463.23 of the Penal Code. The court shall, however, take into consideration the defendant’s ability to pay, and no defendant shall be denied probation because of his or her inability to pay the fine permitted under this subdivision.

(Amended by Stats. 2011, Ch. 15, Sec. 171. Effective April 4, 2011. Operative October 1, 2011, by Sec. 636 of Ch. 15, as amended by Stats. 2011, Ch. 39, Sec. 68.)
ded. to the 1st amm. -ed

So what is the predicted outcome of such a set of felonies? A County Lid. (that means one year of jail, not prison, time) A 5-point star tatoo is also earned. These are not things you ever want law enforcement to accuse you of. Case study indicates this a fucking bummer and sad, but as stated, upon judicial review what sounds and looks like hard time may be as low as velvet time, with even less due to separation of powers (thx Thomas J and John L), the death throes of the alcohol and tobacco funded “War on Drugs” (Nancy Reagan….c—) and sanity from the Orange County Judiciary (but not the executive, who can line up at Harbor and Wilson to blow me) []

10 Replies to “CA Law review; PC 400s and H&SC 11300s, anon. case study…”

  1. This is a comment to the admin. Your CA Law review; PC 400s and H&SC 11300s, anon. case study… | TapperSeven>–~–<DotCom website is missing out on at least 300 visitors per day. I have found a company which offers to dramatically increase your traffic to your site: http://bp7.org/ir They offer 500 free visitors during their free trial period and I managed to get over 15,000 visitors per month using their services, you could also get lot more targeted visitors than you have now. Hope this helps 🙂 Take care.

    1. William- fuck you and whatever you are selling I have plenty readers do not waste my time with your fagget spam bullshit…I’m getting really sick of you fucking cunts so go the fuck away. YOU ARE NOT WELCOME HERE. The readers are tired of it…and I do hope that you contract syphilis or gonorrhea and you die of an infection related to one of them. k thx bye!

  2. I came to your CA Law review; PC 400s and H&SC 11300s, anon. case study… | TapperSeven>–~–<DotCom page and noticed you could have a lot more traffic. I have found that the key to running a website is making sure the visitors you are getting are interested in your subject matter. There is a company that you can get traffic from and they let you try the service for free. I managed to get over 300 targeted visitors to day to my site. Check it out here: http://bp7.org/ir

    1. I don’t need any help…how do you know I need more traffic? …other than the fact every site…from mine to google “could use more traffic”????
      THIS SITE SELLS ITSELF. Grows daily…I wrote some excellent javascript that gives me all the analytical data I need and it all points to an upward trend, but at least I dont get the feel you are trying to spam me …so thx for that…plz return if you enjoy my content.

  3. I see a lot of interesting articles here. You have to spend a lot of time writing, i know how to
    save you a lot of work, there is an online tool that creates unique, SEO friendly articles in minutes, just search in google – k2 unlimited content

  4. Hi, my name is Breanna and I am the sales manager at Smelly Cunts Consolidated Marketing Strategy Systems. I was just looking at your website and see that your site has the potential to become very popular. I just want to tell you, In case you don’t already know… There is a website network Which already has more than 19 users, and the majority of the users are interested in niches like yours, most of them have AIDs and molest children. By getting your website on this network you have a chance to get your site more popular than you can imagine. It is free to sign up and you can read more about it here: http://link_missing_OOOPSIE!!!! – Now, let me ask you… Do you need your website to be successful to maintain your business? Do you need targeted visitors who are interested in the services and products you offer? Are looking for exposure, to increase sales, and to quickly develop awareness for your website? If your answer is YES, you can achieve these things only if you get your website on the network I am describing. This traffic network advertises you to sociopaths, while also giving you a chance to test the network for only 75,000 pounds, Sterling. All the popular blogs (that’s lie they are barely noticeable…no one reads this shit–ed) using this network to boost their readership and ad revenue! Why aren’t you? And what is better than traffic? It’s recurring traffic! That’s how running a successful website works… Here’s to your success! Find out more here: http://PC_blue_banders_from_chino_state_prison.gov

    1. Ok…
      …I’m not
      …I don’t
      …no
      …cuz I already have lots of traffic and for GOD’s sake kid-touchers ARE NOT WELCOME ON THIS SITE. What IS IT with you animals? I’ll take flight on ANY blue-bander at a moment’s notice…and YOU KNOW THIS. Guards and workers alike throughly enjoy spitting in their food and pegging them right in the kisser with non-fat milk. I hope all of them die in horrible pain; preferavly of untreated-AIDs. Reader: I swear to GOD I only mildly modified this comment…I changed some numbers around…can you believe this shit? I approved this so you could see the depravity “Breanna” stooped to get a backlink on my site, well…this one of the rare one I HAVE to gibe-in to. “SCCMS”??? srsly wtf…again…I DID NOT WRITE THIS. On my Jewsihness I did NOT modify the meaning of the content, someone ACTUALLY wrote this that is SICK and twisted, but in the BAD WAY, nu?
      Fair warnign: one hit from Chino and I’ll take their entire server down, you think the COs will give a shit if I do? I’ll overclock the f-ing thing and MELT IT if I have to. Try me….sheesh. Now fk off!

  5. I read a lot of interesting content here. Probably you spend a
    lot of time writing, i know how to save you a lot
    of time, there is an online tool that creates
    unique, SEO friendly posts in seconds, just search in google – laranitas free
    I have a severe learning disorder and I hate Jews.

    1. Thank you for the FASCINATING COMMENT! It is probably due to the learning-disorder and your rampant anti-semitism that makes you THINK SEO is NOT a complete hackload of bull—. That’s a bummer-the whole “mongoloid”-thing. Could you please get AIDs and die? Disregards, Tapper.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.